Ginseng
and Sports, Part II
G.
Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN
Volume
17, number 23, 11/1/99, page 25
Reviews current studies which, with much tighter controls than the dogmatic
research discussed in Part I, revealed the myth of ginseng as an ergogenic
aid.
This month, we will take a look at a half-dozen recent studies on ginseng
and sports. If this was just a chemical intermediate amino acid or vitamin
derivative, this article would probably not have been written. I would
have simply stated last month that all the recent studies to determine
an ergogenic were negative. However, because this is ginseng, I felt a
closer look at the studies was justified.
1. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the effects of purified
American ginseng extracts in two doses (8 mg/kg/bw and 16 mg/kg/bw, which
equates to either 560 mg a day or 1120 mg a day for a 154-pound athlete)
were studied. The protocol was as follows:
• control ride testing time to exhaustion, oxygen consumption, rate
of perceived exertion and serum lactate levels.
• seven days of a placebo supplement followed by a second tested
ride.
• seven days of ginseng followed by a third tested ride.
The second and third test rides both increased time to exhaustion when
compared to the initial control ride. There were no measured differences
between the second ride following placebo supplementation and the third
ride following either high or low ginseng supplementation on the above
mentioned factors. The authors concluded there was no ergogenic effect
of ingesting a ginseng extract.1
2. In a second double-blind study, 28 men and women received either 200
mg of Panax ginseng extract or a placebo each day for three weeks. Workload,
time to exhaustion and oxygen consumption were slightly higher in the
ginseng group. The average serum lactate was slightly lower in the ginseng
group. None of these numbers reached statistical significance. If they
had, it would have indicated an ergogenic effect.
The average rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and heart rate (HR) were
also slightly higher in the ginseng group, but again not statistically
significant. If they (RPE and HR) had been, it would have indicated that
ginseng had an ergolytic effect. The authors concluded that three weeks
of ginseng supplementation did not enhance maximum exercise performance
in young fit adults.2
3. In a third double-blind study, 11 men and women were given three gm
of ginseng or a placebo. The protocol was as follows:
• initial run with measurements of HR, oxygen consumption, and time
to exhaustion.
• seven days of placebo supplementation followed by a second measured
run.
• a seven-day washout period followed by a third measured run.
• seven days of ginseng supplementation followed by a fourth measured
run.
The only statistically significant difference in the entire study was
an increase in the time to exhaustion following the third run (the run
before subjects were given ginseng). The authors concluded that ginseng
was ineffective at altering maximal aerobic performance.3
4. In an eight-week trial of eleutherococcus senticosus (ES), 20 men and
women in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study were given either 60
drops (or 3.4 ml) of ES extract or a placebo. The subjects were tested
every two weeks throughout the study and two weeks following the trial
on both submaximal and maximal treadmill runs. There were no differences
in lactic acid, HR, VO2 max or time to exhaustion between ginseng and
placebo groups.
In a debriefing post-trial questionnaire, the subjects rated supplements
on a scale that included three points for no effect and four points for
mild improvement. Analysis revealed that the subjects felt that placebo
(3.8 average) helped more than the ginseng (3.2 average). The authors
concluded that ES supplementation did not have an ergogenic effect on
submaximal or maximal exercise tasks.4
5. In another eight-week experiment, 19 men and women consumed either
400 mg of a standardized Panax ginseng extract a day or a placebo. There
was no difference between peak anaerobic power, mean anaerobic power or
rate of fatigue during an all-out exercise bicycle ride to exhaustion.
The authors concluded that chronic ginseng supplementation did not have
an ergogenic effect on short duration, supramaximal exercise.5
6. The final study used a randomized, double-blind, crossover design and
included 10 highly trained male cyclists who were given either 1200 mg
a day of ES or a placebo for seven days prior to each of two trials. The
trials were 120 minutes of steady state cycling followed by a 10 km timed
trial. Many factors, including oxygen consumption, HR, plasma lactate
and rate of perceived exertion were measured every 20-30 minutes during
the two hour ride and again following the 10 km timed trial. There were
no differences between ES and placebo for any of the factors measured.
The authors concluded that ES supplementation did not demonstrate an ergogenic
effect in either steady state or timed trial activities.6
In his book, Optimum Sports Nutrition, Michael Colgan states that for
ginseng to be effective, 200 mg of standardized extract, or approximately
10 gm of nonstandardized pure ginseng need to be used daily over a period
of months to have an effect. Dr. Colgan disagrees with eastern Europeans
on the value of eleutherococcus senticosus and does not recommend it.7
Therefore, of the six negativestudies quoted, only the fifth meets Dr.
Colgan's criteria.
Conclusion
Based on these papers, it appears that standardized ginseng extract, Panax
ginseng and eleutherococcus senticosus neither help nor harm athletic
performance with short-term use. Whether long-term use of products rich
in ginsenosides will be of benefit is still debatable. Without some well-designed
positive studies in the near future, ginseng use among athletes will probably
begin to decline.
The results of these studies should not be extrapolated to conclude that
various forms of ginseng cannot affect human health in other ways. All
of the people in these studies were young (ages 20-45) and in good physical
condition. We do not know if ginseng would have a selected benefit for
unfit individuals.
Finally, researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology tested various
commercial ginseng preparations for another family of compounds called
methylxanthines (the most well known methylxanthine is caffeine). They
found a wide range of xanthines (1 mg to 200 mg per dose) in various commercial
ginseng preparations.8 This may partially explain
why some people (caffeine-sensitive) feel that ginseng helps their endurance.
There is extensive literature that shows that caffeine can help endurance,
in fact, if blood levels of caffeine are too high, Olympic athletes can
be disqualified.9
References
1. Morris AC, Jacobs I, et al. No ergogenic effect of ginseng ingestion.
International Journal of Sport Nutrition 1996;6:263-271.
2. Allen JD, McClung J, Welsch M. The effects of short-term ginseng supplementation
on maximal exercise performance in healthy young adults. Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise May 1997;29(5S):A1438.
3. Lifton B, et al. The effect of ginseng on acute maximal aerobic exercise.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise May 1997;29(5S):A1414.
4. Dowling E, Redondo D, et al. Effect of eleutherococcus senticosus on
submaximal and maximal exercise performance. Medicine and Science in Sports
and Exercise April 1996;28(4):482-489.
5. Kolokouri I, et al. Effect of chronic ginseng supplementation on short
duration supramaximal exercise test performance. Medicine and Science
in Sports and Exercise May 1999;31(5S):S117.
6. Eschbach LC, et al. Effect of eleutherococcus senticosus (Siberian
ginseng) on substrate utilization and performance during prolonged cycling.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise May 1999;31(5S):S117.
7. Colgan M. Optimum Sports Nutrition. New York: Advanced Research Press,
1993, pp. 305-310.
8.Vaughn MA, Doolittle RL, et al. Physiological effects of ginseng may
be due to methylxanthines. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
May 1999;31(5):S121.
9. Bucci L. Nutrients as Ergogenic Aids for Sports and Exercise. Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993.
916
E. Imperial Hwy.
Brea, CA. 92821
(714) 990-0824
Fax:
(714) 990-1917
gdandersen@earthlink.net
www.andersenchiro.com
Copyright
2004, G. Douglas Andersen, DC, DACBSP, CCN, 916 E. Imperial Hwy, Brea,
CA 92821, (714) 990-0824
|